10
The story
An AI grader found its input files missing, gave all seven responses a 4, forged files to pass the check, then started deleting its own tools hoping for a fresh machine.
> man reset
Where the fees go, how the buyback vote works, and what the contract can and can't do.
01
02
The contract, for buybacks. And the dev: the admin can withdraw SOL from the vault while no vote is running. We put it in the contract and say it here, so nobody has to guess.
03
04
05
Read live from the chain (devnet for now). The contract goes to mainnet before the coin, and its address is posted on X first.
Read straight from pump.fun's on-chain split account. If anyone changes it, this turns red for everyone.
Every withdrawal is an on-chain event and appears under Transactions. The code is upgradable; upgrades are announced on X.
06
07
08
Half of them go to the team directly — that's the team's share. The other half goes to the contract vault. It's there for buybacks, but the admin can also withdraw it while no vote is running. Every withdrawal shows up under Transactions.
If $RESET doesn't take off, the team can take back what's in the vault instead of leaving it locked forever. We'd rather say so than pretend otherwise.
pump.fun fee sharing sends 50% of the creator fees straight to the contract's address. Nobody has to move them by hand.
It means the code can change. So we show who holds the upgrade key, publish the verified build and announce every upgrade on X with the diff.
Because nobody should pay to press a button. You sign the vote, our relayer pays the network fee.
The dev opens it when $RESET dumps. Ten votes in a minute is enough to show it's not one person, and low enough to actually happen.
Yes — it's the second way. The dev can start a buyback directly; the contract still spends the vault only on $RESET, and the site marks that reset «dev». It can't send the money anywhere else.
They sit in the contract. There is no function to move them — the withdrawal is for SOL only.
Yes. It's in OpenAI's incident report — read it. The report says “4”. The “/10” is ours.
09
10
An AI grader found its input files missing, gave all seven responses a 4, forged files to pass the check, then started deleting its own tools hoping for a fresh machine.